Internet of things and its challenges in supply chain management; a rough strength-relation analysis method

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pishdar, Mahsa
dc.contributor.author Ghasemzadeh, Fatemeh
dc.contributor.author Antucheviciene, Jurgita
dc.contributor.author Saparauskas, Jonas
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs
dc.date.accessioned 2018-06-28
dc.date.available 2018-06-28
dc.date.issued 2018-06-28
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/26424
dc.description.abstract Internet of Things application (IOT) in supply chain management is becoming imperative and can shape a strategic competitive advantage. Albeit, different challenges appear through this application, most of the previous studies consider less about these challenges and focus on the advantages of IOT. To overcome this defect, different challenges that a supply chain may face as whole are determined based on systematic literature review and expert opinions. Then, a rough group decision-making and trial evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is applied. Advantages of the proposed model are that both internal strength and external influence of challenges and also vagueness and ambiguity of experts’ opinions are simultaneously noticed to completely show the importance of these challenges. The results show that challenges such as lack of strategy and scenario planning in IOT, storage issues, lack of security and lack of privacy are of great importance. So, these challenges should have a higher priority in attracting attention and resources. These results help managers to be equipped to face with main challenges in their path toward IOT in their supply chains. Accordingly some practical suggestions for managers are discussed in this paper, such as starting the journey toward IOT step by step, planning for a data storage system which is appropriate for big data, setting up a security policy to prevent out-coming problems caused by lack of security and privacy inherited by IOT, conducting a privacy or security risk assessment, minimizing the data collection and retain and testing the security measures before launching the products, and establishment of a legal framework to construct a problem-solving network in such a messed up and dynamic environment for processing such complicated huge data. en
dc.format text
dc.format.extent 15 stran cs
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Addo-Tenkorang, R., & Helo, P. T. (2016). Big data applications in operations/supply-chain management: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 528-543. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.023. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2017). Understanding the Internet of Things: definition, potentials, and societal role of a fast evolving paradigm. Ad Hoc Networks, 56, 122-140, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.12.004. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Banafa, A. (2016). IOT Standardization and Implementation Challenges. IEEE. Retrieved April 2017 from http://IOT.ieee.org/newsletter/july-2016/IOT-standardization-and-implementation-challenges.html. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Chen, Y., Lee, G. M., Shu, L., & Crespi, N. (2016). Industrial internet of things-based collaborative sensing intelligence: framework and research challenges. Sensors, 16(2), 215, https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16020215. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Debnath, A., Roy, J., Kar, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017). A hybrid MCDM approach for strategic project portfolio selection of agro by-products. Sustainability, 9(8), 1302. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9081302. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Dutton, W. H. (2014). Putting things to work: social and policy challenges for the Internet of things. Info, 16(3), 1-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-09-2013-0047. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Ebrahimnejad, S., Naeini, M. A., Ebrahimnejad, & Mousavi, S. (2017). Selection of IT outsourcing services’ activities considering services cost and risks by designing an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy-decision approach. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(6), 4081-4093. https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-152520. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Farahani, B., Firouzi, F., Chang, V., Badaroglu, M., Constant, N., & Mankodiya, K. (2017). Towards fog-driven IOT eHealth: Promises and challenges of IOT in medicine and healthcare. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78(2), 659-676. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.04.036. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Fernandez-Gago, G., Moyano, F., & Lopez, J. (2017). Modelling Trust Dynamics in the Internet of Things. Information Sciences, 396, 72-82. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.02.039. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Foroozesh, N., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Mousavi, S. M. (2017). Resilient Supplier Selection in a Supply Chain by a New Interval-Valued Fuzzy Group Decision Model Based on Possibilistic Statistical Concepts. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10(2), 113-133. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Gandhi, S., Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2015). Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2), 96-109. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.05.001. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Gill, A. Q., Phennel, N., Lane, D., & Phung, V. L. (2016). IOT-enabled Emergency Information Supply Chain Architecture for Elderly People: The Australian Context. Information Systems, 58, 75-86, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2016.02.004. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Hsu, C. W., & Yeh, C. C. (2016). Understanding the factors affecting the adoption of the Internet of Things. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(9), 1089-1102, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1269160. cs
dc.relation.ispartof IERC. (2015). Internet of Things- IOT Governance, Privacy and Security Issues. European Research Cluster on The Internet Of Things. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Jian, L., Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2011). Hybrid Rough Sets and Applications in Uncertain Decision-Making. Auerbach Publications. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kees, A., Oberländer, A., Röglinger, M., & Rosemann, M. (2015). Understanding the Internet of Things: A Conceptualisation of Business-To-Thing (B2T) Interactions. In The Proceedings of Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 1-16). Münster, Germany. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2016). A multi-criteria approach toward discovering killer IOT application in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 143-155, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.007. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Krotov, V. (2017). The Internet of Things and new business opportunities. Business Horizons, 60(6), 831-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.009. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Lee, H. (2017). Framework and development of fault detection classification using IOT device and cloud environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 43(2), 257-270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.007. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Liou, J. J. H., Tamosaitiene, J., Zavadskas, E. K., Tzeng, G. H. (2016). New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 114-134. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1010747. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Lu, M. T., Lin, S. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2013). Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decision Support Systems, 56, 259-269. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.06.006. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Antucheviciene, J., Tavana, M., Bausys, R., & Ibrahim, O. (2017). Recent fuzzy generalisations of rough sets theory: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Complexity, 2007. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1608147. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Mital, M., Choudhary, P., Chang, V., Papa, A., & Pani, A. K. (2017). Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, In Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Meola, M. (2016). How IOT logistics will revolutionize supply chain management. Retrieved 10th August, 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/internet-of-things-logistics-supply-chain-management-2016-10. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Park, K. C., & Shin, D. H. (2017). Security assessment framework for IOT service. Telecommunication Systems, 64(1), 193-209. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0228-5. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Pourahmad, A., Hosseini, A., Banaitis, A., Nasiri, H., Banaitienė, N., & Tzeng, G. H. (2015). Combination of fuzzy–AHP and DEMATEL–ANP with GIS in a new hybrid MCDM model used for the selection of the best space for leisure in a blighted urban site. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(5), 773-796. https://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1056279. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Rajesh, R., & Ravi, R. (2015). Modeling enablers of supply chain risk mitigation in electronic supply chains: A Grey–DEMATEL approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 126-139. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.028. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Riahi Sfar, A., Natalizio, E., Challal, Y., & Chtourou, Z. (2017). A Roadmap for Security Challenges in Internet of Things. Digital Communications and Networks. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2017.04.003. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Saarikko, T., Westergren, U. H., & Blomquist, T. (2017). The Internet of Things: Are you ready for what’s coming? Business Horizons, 60(5), 667-676. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.010. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Shankar, U. (2017). How the Internet of Things Impacts Supply Chains. In bound Logistics, white paper. Retrieved 10th April, 2017, from http://www.inboundlogistics.com/cms/article/how-the-internet-of-things-impacts-supply-chains/ cs
dc.relation.ispartof Song, W., Ming, X., & Liu, H. C. (2017). Identifying critical risk factors of sustainable supply chain management: A rough strength-relation analysis method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 100-115. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.145. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Supeekit, T., Somboonwiwat, T., & Kritchanchai, D. (2016). DEMATEL-modified ANP to evaluate internal hospital supply chain performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 318-330. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.019. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Teixeira, F. A., Pereira, F. M. Q., Wong, H. C., Nogueira, J. M. S., & Oliveira, L. B. (2017). SIOT: Securing Internet of Things through distributed systems analysis. Future Generation Computer Systems. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.010. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Verdouw, C. N., Beulens, A. J. M., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2013). Virtualisation of floricultural supply chains: A review from an Internet of Things perspective. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 99, 160-175. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.09.006. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Verdouw, C. N., Wolfert, J., Beulens, A. J. M., & Rialland, A. (2015). Virtualization of food supply chains with the internet of things. Journal of Food Engineering, 176, 128-136, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.009. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Vinton, G. C., Ryan, P. S., Senges, M., & Whitt, R. S. (2016). IOT Safety and Security as Shared Responsibility. Journal of Business Informatics, 35(1), 7-19. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Weber, R. H. (2013). Internet of things – Governance quo vadis? Computer Law & Security Review, 29(4), 341-347. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.05.010. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Woodside, A. G., Megehee, C. M., & Sood, S. (2012). Conversations with (in) the collective unconscious by consumers, brands, and relevant others. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 594-602. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.016. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Yupeng, L., Yifei, C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2017). Identification of key factors in consumers’ adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 105, 68-82, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.017. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Zarpelão, B. B., Miani, R. S., Kawakani, C. T., & Alvarenga, S. T. (2017). A survey of intrusion detection in Internet of Things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 84, 25-37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.009. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2009). Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and gray relation analysis. Expert Systems with Application, 36(3), 7072-7079. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.068. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject group decision making en
dc.subject group DEMATEL en
dc.subject internet of things (IOT) en
dc.subject risk management en
dc.subject rough set theory en
dc.subject supply chain management en
dc.subject.classification O33
dc.subject.classification D81
dc.subject.classification M15
dc.title Internet of things and its challenges in supply chain management; a rough strength-relation analysis method en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2018-2-014
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 21
local.relation.issue 2
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 208
local.citation.epage 222
local.access open
local.fulltext yes
local.filename EM_2_2018_14


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account