DSpace Repository

Show simple item record Trnková, Gabriela Žáková Kroupová, Zdeňka
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs 2021-09-15T08:08:07Z 2021-09-15T08:08:07Z
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.description.abstract This paper is focused on the investigation of the competitiveness drivers, namely technical and scale efficiency and technological change, and their relation to the profitability of the Czech food processing companies in the period 2016–2019. This investigation is based on the stochastic frontier modelling of an input distance function in the specification of the four-error-component model. The model is estimated with a multi-step procedure employing the generalized method of moments estimator addressing the potential endogeneity of netputs, and panel data gained from the Bisnode Albertina database. The results revealed (evaluated on the sample mean) that investigated food processing sectors were scale efficient in the analysed period, however, their production technologies exhibited prevailing technological regress. Moreover, the room for almost 17% cost reduction by the technical efficiency improvements was found out in all investigated sectors. Although inter-sectoral differences exist in the scale efficiency, technological change and technical efficiency dynamics, to increase the productivity and competitiveness of food processing companies, it is generally appropriate to focus on technical efficiency and technological change improvements. Both these competitiveness drivers connected with the cost reduction and minimizing of wastage of inputs are achievable through innovations. In general, the basic source of their financing is profit, the achievement of which is supported by cost minimization. However, it was found that sub-sectors, which are linked to sensitive sectors of agricultural production – that means sectors with the lowest national self-sufficiency, the highest level of imports and thus strong cost reduction pressure – have problem to translate the ability to produce efficiently into profitability. Although these food sectors, which have been also facing strong competition for a long time, which leads to significant pressure to reduce costs, achieved the highest technical efficiency, their profitability was lowest from the investigated sectors. en
dc.format text
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon Allendorf, J., & Hirsch, S. (2015). Dynamic productivity growth in the European food processing industry. In Proceedings of 55th Annual Conference of German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA). September 23–25, 2015, Giessen, Germany.
dc.relation.isbasedon Badunenko, O., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2016). When, where and how to estimate persistent and transient efficiency in stochastic frontier panel data models. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 272–287.
dc.relation.isbasedon Baležentis, T., & Sun, K. (2020). Measurement of technical inefficiency and total factor productivity growth: A semiparametric stochastic input distance frontier approach and the case of Lithuanian dairy farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(3), 1174–1188.
dc.relation.isbasedon Baráth, L., & Fertő, I. (2015). Heterogeneous technology, scale of land use and technical efficiency: The case of Hungarian crop farms. Land Use Policy, 42, 141–150.
dc.relation.isbasedon Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
dc.relation.isbasedon Blažková, I., & Dvouletý, O. (2017). Drivers of ROE and ROA in the Czech food industry in the context of market concentration. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(3), 3–13.
dc.relation.isbasedon Blažková, I., & Dvouletý, O. (2019). Investigating the differences in entrepreneurial success through the firm-specific factors: Microeconomic evidence from the Czech food industry. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11(2), 154–176.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bokusheva, B., & Čechura, L. (2017). Evaluating dynamics, sources and drivers of productivity growth at the farm level (Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 106). Paris: OECD Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedon Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393–1414.
dc.relation.isbasedon Czech Statistical Office. (2021). Prices of producers – time series. Retrieved April 1, 2021, from
dc.relation.isbasedon Čechura, L., & Hockmann, H. (2010). Sources of economical growth in the Czech food processing. Prague Economic Papers, 19(2), 169–182.
dc.relation.isbasedon Čechura, L. (2014). Analysis of the Technical and Scale Efficiency of Farms Operating in LFA. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 6(4), 33–44.
dc.relation.isbasedon Čechura, L., Hockmann, H., & Kroupová, Z. (2014). Productivity and Efficiency of European Food Processing Industry (Compete Working Paper N7). Halle: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition economies (IAMO). Retrieved February 20, 2021, from
dc.relation.isbasedon Čechura, L., & Malá, Z. (2014). Technology and Efficiency Comparison of Czech and Slovak Processing Companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 93–102.
dc.relation.isbasedon Čechura, L., & Hockmann, H. (2017). Heterogeneity in Production Structures and Efficiency: An Analysis of the Czech Food Processing Industry. Pacific Economic Review, 22(4), 702–719.
dc.relation.isbasedon Čechura, L., & Žáková Kroupová, Z. (2021). Technical Efficiency in the European Dairy Industry: Can We Observe Systematic Failures in the Efficiency of Input Use? Sustainability, 13(4), 1830.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gschwandtner, A., & Hirsch, S. (2018). What Drives Firm Profitability? A Comparison of the US and EU Food Processing Industry. The Manchester School, 86(3), 390–416.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hirsch, S., Schiefer, J., Gschwandtner, A., & Hartmann, M. (2014). The determinants of firm profitability differences in EU food processing. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(3), 703–721.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hirsch, S., & Schiefer, J. (2016). What Causes Firm Profitability Variation in the EU Food Industry? A Redux of Classical Approaches of Variance Decomposition. Agribusiness, 32(1), 79–92.
dc.relation.isbasedon Chambers, R. G. (1988). Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedon Chirinko, R. S., & Fazzari, S. M. (1994). Economic fluctuations, market power, and returns to scale: Evidence from firm‐level data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 9(1), 47–69.
dc.relation.isbasedon Coelli, T., & Perelman, S. (2000). Technical Efficiency of European Railways: A Distance Function Approach. Applied Economics, 32(15), 1967–1976.
dc.relation.isbasedon Dimara, E., Skuras, D., Tsekouras, K., & Tzelepis, D. (2008). Productive efficiency and firm exit in the food sector. Food Policy, 33(2), 185–196.
dc.relation.isbasedon Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.
dc.relation.isbasedon Filippini, M., & Greene, W. H. (2016). Persistent and Transient Productive Inefficiency: A Maximum Simulated Likelihood Approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 45(2), 187–196.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gordon, M., & Davidova, S. (2004). Farm productivity and efficiency in the CEE applicant countries: a synthesis of results. Agricultural Economics, 30(1), 1–16.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gumbau-Albert, M., & Maudos, J. (2002). The determinants of efficiency: the case of the Spanish industry. Applied Economics, 34(15), 1941–1948.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hailu, A., & Veeman, T. S. (2000). Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Analysis of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1959–1994: An Input Distance Function Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(3), 251–274.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hedvičáková, M., & Král, M. (2021). Performance Evaluation Framework under the Influence of Industry 4.0: The Case of the Czech Manufacturing Industry. E&M Economics and Management, 24(1), 118–134.
dc.relation.isbasedon Irz, X., & Thirtle, C. (2005). Dual Technological Development in Botswana Agriculture: A Stochastic Input Distance Function Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), 455–478.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kapelko, M. (2019). Measuring productivity change accounting for adjustment costs: evidence from the food industry in the European Union. Annals of Operations Research, 278(1), 215–234.
dc.relation.isbasedon Karagiannis, G., Midmore, P., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2004). Parametric Decomposition of Output Growth Using a Stochastic Input Distance Function. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(4), 1044–1057.
dc.relation.isbasedon Keramidou, I., Mimis, A., Fotinopoulou, A., & Tassis, C. D. (2013). Exploring the relationship between efficiency and profitability. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(5), 647–660.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kounetas, K., & Tsekouras, K. (2007). Measuring Scale Efficiency Change Using a Translog Distance Function. International Journal of Business and Economics, 6(1), 63–69.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumar, S. (2008). An Analysis of Efficiency–Profitability Relationship in Indian Public Sector Banks. Global Business Review, 9(1), 115–129.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumbhakar, S. C., & Knox Lovell, C. A. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumbhakar, S. C., Orea, L., Rodriguez-Álvarez, A., & Tsionas, E. G. (2007). Do we estimate an input or an output distance function? An application of the mixture approach to European railways. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27(2), 87–100.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumbhakar, S. C., & Tsionas, E. G. (2012). Firm heterogeneity, persistent and transient technical inefficiency: a generalized true random effects model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29(1), 110–132.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumbhakar, S. C., & Lien, G. (2009). Productivity and profitability decomposition: A parametric distance function approach. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C – Food Economics, 6(3–4), 143–155.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumbhakar, S. C., Lien, G., & Hardaker, J. B. (2014). Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: A study of Norwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 321–337,
dc.relation.isbasedon Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors (OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 30). Paris: OECD Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedon Lien, G., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Alem, H. (2018). Endogeneity, heterodeneity, and determinants of inefficiency in Norwegian crop-producing farms. International Journal of Production Economics, 201, 53–61.
dc.relation.isbasedon Mathijs, E., & Vranken, L. (2000). Farm restructuring and efficiency in transition: evidence from Bulgaria and Hungary. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Tampa, FL, USA, July 30–August 2.
dc.relation.isbasedon Mezera, J., Plášil, M., & Náglová, Z. (2019). Panorama potravinářského průmyslu 2019 [Panorama of the Food industry 2019]. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
dc.relation.isbasedon Morroni, M. (2006). Knowledge, Scale and Transactions in the Theory of the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ministry of Industry and Trade. (2019). Panorama zpracovatelského průmyslu ČR 2018 [Panorama of the Manufacturing Industry 2018]. Retrieved April, 2021, from
dc.relation.isbasedon Njuki, E., & Bravo-Ureta, B. E. (2015). The Economic Costs of Environmental Regulation in U.S. Dairy Farming: A Directional Distance Function Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(4), 1087–1106.
dc.relation.isbasedon Roodman, D. (2009). How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
dc.relation.isbasedon Rudinskaya, T., & Kuzmenko, E. (2019). Investments, Technical Change and Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Czech Food Processing. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 11(4), 93–103.
dc.relation.isbasedon Rudinskaya, T., & Náglová, Z. (2018). Impact of Subsidies on Technical Efficiency of Meat Processing Companies. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 10(1), 61–70.
dc.relation.isbasedon Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedon Singbo, A., & Larue, B. (2016). Scale Economies, Technical Efficiency, and the Sources of Total Factor Productivity Growth of Quebec Dairy Farms. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroéconomie, 64(2), 339–363.
dc.relation.isbasedon Soboh, R. A. M. E., Oude Lansink, A., & Van Dijk, G. (2014). Efficiency of European Dairy Processing Firm. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 70–71, 53–59.
dc.relation.isbasedon Tsionas, E. G., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Malikov, E. (2015). Estimation of Input Distance Functions: A System Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(5), 1478–1493.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ullah, S., Akhtar, P., & Zaefarian, G. (2018). Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78.
dc.relation.isbasedon Vokoun, M., Polanecký, L., & Stellner, F. (2015). The impact of the recent economic crisis on the food industry in the Czech and Slovak Republic. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34(3), 142–148.
dc.relation.isbasedon Zelenyuk, V. (2015). Aggregation of scale efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 269–277.
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject stochastic frontier analysis en
dc.subject technical efficiency en
dc.subject profitability en
dc.subject food processing industry en
dc.subject the Czech Republic en
dc.subject.classification D24
dc.subject.classification L66
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2021-03-007
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 24
local.relation.issue 3
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 110
local.citation.epage 127
local.access open
local.fulltext yes

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account