At the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kraftová, Ivana
dc.contributor.author Doudová, Iveta
dc.contributor.author Miláček, Radim
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-10
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-13T08:33:31Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-13T08:33:31Z
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/26627
dc.description.abstract At the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century, the Fourth Industrial Revolution based on the digitization of production processes, more precisely connecting the virtual world to the real world began. The aim of this article is to present the results of the research that focused on comparing the positions of the selected group of countries at the threshold of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in terms of their performance and competitiveness. The analysis is aimed at 13 countries – the six largest economies of the world and seven economies of the former Soviet bloc – from 1993 to 2015 using the localization quotient and index of regional concentration of the industry on the basis of gross added value, supplemented by the SHADE model, the Balassa index and evaluating the comparative advantage of countries in the area of ICT. The research defines the position pattern of countries for the manufacturing and ICT industries. It cannot be said that the differences in localization, resp. the concentration of the industries surveyed were determined by the size of the economy or its membership of traditional market economies. Exportability in ICT goods positively evaluates those economies that have managed to increase their positive Balassa index over time, resp. to get from its negative values to positive ones. The beginning of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is an unrepeatable moment of human history, just as it was with the First, Second and Third Industrial Revolutions. The one who knows and is able to accept, use and multiply the supporting trends is the one who gains. en
dc.format text
dc.format.extent 17 stran cs
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Blažek, J. (2012). Regionální inovační systémy a globální produkční sítě: dvojí optika na zdroje konkurenceschopnosti v současném světě? Geografie, 117(2), 209-233. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Dlouhý, V. (2016). Neničme talenty, průmysl to ocení. Svět 2017. Praha: Economia. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Doucek, P., Maryška, M., & Novotný, O. (2013). Analýza souladu obsahu ICT studijních oborů s požadavky praxe v České republice. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 16(3), 148-161. cs
dc.relation.ispartof European Commission. (2010). Evropa 2020. Strategie pro inteligentní a udržitelný růst podporující začlenění. Brusel: COM. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Fisher, A. G. B. (1939). Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record, 15(1), 24-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1939.tb01015.x. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Fojtíková, L. (2016). Trends in the revealed comparative advantages of the EU member states. Economic Annals-XXI, 161(9-10), 7-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-02. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Garvy, G. (1943). Kondratieff’s Theory of Long Cycles. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 25(4), 203-220. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1927337. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Gatautis, R. (2008). The Impact of ICT on Public and Private Sectors in Lithuania. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 59(4), 18-28. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Grinin, L. E., Grinin, A. L., & Korotayev, A. (2017). Forthcoming Kondratieff wave, Cybernetic Revolution, and global ageing. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 115, 52-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.017. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Jirsák, P., Martinéz, F., Lorenc, M., & Jančík, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic – State of the Art. In Proceedings of the 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics (pp. 766-769). cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kamensky, E. (2017). Society. Personality. Technologies: Social Paradoxes of Industry 4.0. Economic Annals, XXI, 164(3-4), 9-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.21003/ea.V164-02. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Korbel, P. (2016). Reindustrializace je cestou k bezpečí. Svět 2017. Praha: Economia. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kotynková, M. (2016). Industry 4.0: Europe's (Re)Industrialization Needs a Global Level. In Proceedings of the 16th international scientific conference Globalization and its Socio-economic Consequences (pp. 1014-1021). cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kraft, J. (2016). Analysis of Changes in Selected Market Structures in Relation to Economic Success. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 27(1), 32-28. . cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kraftová, I. (2011). Odvětvové změny a rozvoj regionů. ERSA, Zimný seminár regionálnej vedy (pp. 1-14). cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kraftová, I., Matěja, Z., & Zdražil, P. (2013). Innovation Industry Drivers. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum (pp. 334-342). Liberec: Technická univerzita v Liberci. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Kraftová, I., & Prášilová, P. (2013). Prosperující podnik v regionálním kontextu. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Li, G., Hou, Y., & Wu, A. (2017). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Technological Drivers, Impacts and Coping Methods. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4), 626-637. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11769-017-0890-x. cs
dc.relation.ispartof MacDougall, W. (2014). Industrie 4.0. Smart Manufactruing for the Futurre. Berlin: GTAI. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impacts on society and firms. Futures, 90, 40-60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Mallick, J., & Kraftová, I. (2015). The Development of Quaternary Activities in Japanese Economy. Asian Economic Review, 57(2), 1-14. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Marais, G. (1981). Structural Changes in Manufacturing Industry 1916 to 1975. South African Journal of Economics, 49(1), 16-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.1981.tb00686.x. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalson, I., Malmberg, A., & Vatne, E. (1998). Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development. (Specialisation and prosperity in small open economies). London and New York: Routledge. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Maštálka, M., & Vávra, M. (2016). Koncept smart cities v prostředí České republiky. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.), 19th International Colloquium on reginal Sciences (pp. 747-752). https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-95. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the CR. (2014). Národní výzkumná a inovační strategie pro inteligentní specializaci České republiky (Národní RIS3 strategie). Retrieved July 29, 2017, from . cs
dc.relation.ispartof OECD. (2011). Guide on Measuring the Information Society 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2017, from . cs
dc.relation.ispartof Paci, R. (1997). More similar and less equal: Economic growth in the European regions. Review of World Economics, 133(4), 609-634. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02707405. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Postelnicu, C., Dinu, V., & Dabija, D. C. (2015). Economic Deglobalization – from Hypothesis to Reality. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 18(2), 4-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-001. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Půžová, K., & Marešová, P. (2014). . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 880-885. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.558. cs
dc.relation.ispartof PwC. (2017). Lidé a digitalizace byznysu. Průzkum názorů generálních ředitelů. Praha: Economia. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Red. (2013). Evropa na sestupu. Míří do „druhé ligy“. Ekonom, 57(40), 47-51. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Rogoff, K. (2012). Poučení ze hry králů. Ekonom, 56(41), 38. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Rostow, W. W. (1985). Is There Need for Economic Leadership – Japanese or United States. American Economic Review, 75(2), 285-291. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Saboniene, A. (2009). Lithuanian Export Competitiveness: Comparison with other Baltic States. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 60(2), 49-57. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Saboniene, A. (2010). The Evaluation of the Potential of Lithuanian Manufacturing Industry Structure on the Basis of CI Index. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 61(4), 399-407. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Sachs, J. D. (2014). Nová globální vedoucí role Číny. Ekonom, 58(49), 36. cs
dc.relation.ispartof The National Convention on the EU. (2016). Společnost 4.0. Praha: Hospodářská komora ČR. cs
dc.relation.ispartof UNCTAD. (2014). Updating the Partnership Definition of ICT Goods from HS 2007 to HS 2012. Retrieved July 27, 2017, from . cs
dc.relation.ispartof UNSTAT. (2016). GDP/breakdown at constant 2005 prices in US Dollars (all countries and regions). Retrieved March 22, 2016, from . cs
dc.relation.ispartof Vacek, J. (2016). Socio-Economic Aspects of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings 4th International Conference on Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Corporate Sustainability (pp. 731-741). cs
dc.relation.ispartof Volejníková, J., & Lelek, T. (2012). Hospodářský růst v éře nové ekonomiky. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, XXI(39/1), 98-106. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Zdražil, P., & Applová, P. (2016). Growth Disparities among Regions of the Visegrad Group Countries: An Evidence of Their Extent and Nature. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 9(2), 37-53. cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject The fourth industrial revolution en
dc.subject localization and concentration of industry en
dc.subject manufacturing en
dc.subject ICT en
dc.subject position pattern en
dc.subject ICT goods en
dc.subject comparative advantage en
dc.subject performance en
dc.subject competitiveness en
dc.subject.classification F63
dc.subject.classification L69
dc.subject.classification O33
dc.title At the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution en
dc.title.alternative who gets who loses en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-002
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 21
local.relation.issue 3
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 23
local.citation.epage 39
local.access open
local.fulltext yes
local.filename EM_3_2018_02


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account