Land Tenure and Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Tea Producers: The Case of Ya’An City, China

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record Gessesse, Abrham Tezera He, Ge
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs 2021-06-04T08:54:56Z 2021-06-04T08:54:56Z
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.description.abstract 70 percent of the world and 80 percent of China’s tea production produced by smallholder farmers. However, the tea production per unit area significantly unchanged in the past decades. Understanding factors affecting the technical efficiency of smallholder tea producers is very important to maximize tea production. Aimed at examining the impact of land tenure security and land certification on smallholder tea producers’ technical efficiency, this paper employs the Cobb- Douglas Stochastic Production Frontier (CD-SPF) and Translog Stochastic Production Frontier (TL- SPF) methods for Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) with cross-sectional data collected from 161 randomly selected tea farm plot households in Ya’an city, China. We found that an 1 mu (0.067 ha) increase in the tea farm size will produce a 1.086 tea yield advantage for smallholder tea farmers. We also found that the values of input-output elasticity of land size, household income and labor decrease in turn with 0.144, 0.105 and 0.010 respectively. The results show that farm size is a more crucial input for tea production than income and labor. Moreover, we identify the determinations which enhance the technical efficiency of smallholder tea producers such as land certification, land tenure security age, education, farming experience, total farm size holding, chemical fertilizer, plot steepness and plot distance from home and find that the elimination of land tenure insecurity through land registration and certification makes a clear difference in that. We therefore recommend that tea farmland need to expand and enlarge for better production through comprehensive land consolidation program. We also suggest endorsing the land certificates of all land holders as this will help improve land tenure security, enhance technical efficiency and promote the tea production of smallholder producers. en
dc.format text
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2000). Structural Adjustment and Economic Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 503– 520.
dc.relation.isbasedon Adesina, A. A., Mbila, D., Nkamleu, G. B., & Endamana, D. (2000). Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southwest Cameroon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 80(3), 255–265. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00152-3
dc.relation.isbasedon Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.
dc.relation.isbasedon Barlow, C. H. (2011). Chinese Rural Land Registration and Certification Program: A Case Study in Modeling Costs and Benefits for a Systematic Registration Campaign. Paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, April 18–20, 2011, Washington DC.
dc.relation.isbasedon Basu Majumder, A., Bera, B., & Rajan, A. (2010). Tea Statistics: Global Scenario. International Journal of Tea Science, 8(1), 121–124.
dc.relation.isbasedon Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332.
dc.relation.isbasedon Benjamin, D., & Brandt, L. (2002). Property rights, labor markets, and efficiency in a transition economy: The case of rural China. The Canadian Journal of Economics – Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 35(4), 689–716.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bruce, J. W., Hoben, A., & Rahmato, D. (1994). After the Dergan assessment of rural land tenure issues in Ethiopia. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.
dc.relation.isbasedon Chang, K. (2015). World tea production and trade: Current and future development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation.
dc.relation.isbasedon Chen, A. Z., Huffman, W. E., & Rozelle, S. (2003). Technical efficiency of Chinese grain production: A stochastic production frontier approach. Paper presented at American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, July 27–30, 2003, Montreal, Canada.
dc.relation.isbasedon Chen, A. Z., Huffman, W. E., & Rozelle, S. (2009). Farm technology and technical efficiency: Evidence from four regions in China. China Economic Review, 20(2), 153–161.
dc.relation.isbasedon Coelli, T. J. (1996). A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: a computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation (CEPA Working paper No. 7/96). Armidale: University of New England, Department of Econometrics.
dc.relation.isbasedon Deininger, K., & Jin, S. (2005). The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development: Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 241–270.
dc.relation.isbasedon Fan, S., & Chan-Kang, C. (2005). Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 32(s1), 135–146. 5150.2004.00019.x
dc.relation.isbasedon FAO. (2003). The design of land consolidation pilot projects in Central and Eastern Europe. Rome: FAO.
dc.relation.isbasedon Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ghebru, H., & Holden, S. T. (2015). Technical Efficiency and Productivity Differential Effects of Land Right Certification: A Quasi-Experimental Evidence. Zeitschrift für Ausländische Landwirtschaft, 54(1), 1–31.
dc.relation.isbasedon Huffman, W. E. (2001). Human capital: Education and agriculture. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 1(A), 333–381.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kiprono, P. K., Sudoi, V. K., M’ribu Kaburu, & Mwaura, F. K. (2011). The socio economic factors influencing productivity of the smallholder subsector of the Kenyan tea industry: A survey of Nandi district. International Journal of Current Research, 3(09), 031–034.
dc.relation.isbasedon Li, Y., Liu, Y., Long, H., & Cui, W. (2014). Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocation can help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agricultural areas of China: Evidence from Dancheng County, Henan Province. Land Use Policy, 39, 188–198. landusepol.2014.02.016
dc.relation.isbasedon Lighton, D., Guveya, E., Bandason, W., & Mashapa, C. (2014). Socioeconomic Determinants of Smallholder Out-grower Tea (Camellia Sinensis) Farming Profitability in Chipinge District, Zimbabwe. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 2(4), 150–156. jaerd.11.03.2014
dc.relation.isbasedon Liu, Z., & Zhuang, J. (2000). Determinants of technical efficiency in post-collective Chinese agriculture: Evidence from farm-level data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(3), 545–564.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ma, X., Heerink, N., van Ierland, E., van den Berg, M., & Shi, X. (2013). Land tenure security and land investments in Northwest China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 5(2), 281–307.
dc.relation.isbasedon Michler, J. D., & Shively, G. (2012). Tenure and Technical Efficiency among Philippine Rice Farmers. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of Agricultural & Applied Economics Association, August 12–14, 2012, Seattle, WA, USA.
dc.relation.isbasedon Namwata, B. M., Lwelamira, J., & Mzirai, O. B. (2010). Adoption of improved agricultural technologies for Irish potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) among farmers in Mbeya Rural district, Tanzania: Acase of Ilungu ward. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 8(1), 927–935.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ogundaria, K., & Awokuse, T. (2016). Land Tenure and Technical Efficiency of Rice Farms in Thailand. Paper presented at the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, March 14–18, 2016, Washington DC.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sichuan Provincial Bureau of Statistics (SPSB). (2016). Sichuan Statistical Yearbook – 2015. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
dc.relation.isbasedon Tan, S., Heerink, N., & Qu, F. (2006). Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China. Land Use Policy, 23(3), 272–285. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.12.001
dc.relation.isbasedon Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kuyvenhoven, A., & Qu, F. (2010). Impact of land fragmentation on rice producers’ technical efficiency in South- East China. NJAS Wageningen – Journal of Life Sciences, 57(2), 117–123. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.njas.2010.02.001
dc.relation.isbasedon Thomas, J. (2006). What’s on regarding land consolidation in Europe? In Proceedings of the XXIII FIG congress, Shaping the change (pp. 8–13). October 8–13, 2006, Munich.
dc.relation.isbasedon Wang, J., Cramer, G. L., & Wailes, E. J. (1996). Production efficiency of Chinese agriculture: Evidence from rural household survey data. Agricultural Economics, 15(1), 17–28. 5150(96)01192-9
dc.relation.isbasedon Wang, J. Y., Liu, Y. S., & Chen, Y. F. (2010). Spatial expansion pattern and its dynamic mechanism of typical rural settlements in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Geographical Research, 29(10), 1833–1840. yj2010100011
dc.relation.isbasedon Wang, Q., Zhang, M., & Cheong, K. C. (2014). Stakeholder perspectives of China’s land consolidation program: A case study of Dongguan Village, Shandong Province. Habitat International, 43, 172–180. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.03.006
dc.relation.isbasedon Zhang, W.-S., Li, F.-M., Xiong, Y.-C., & Xia, Q. (2012). Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of raising sheep in folds by farmers in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Economics, 74, 145–152.
dc.relation.isbasedon Zhao, Y. (2010). China’s rural development challenges: Land tenure reform and local institutional experimentation (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen: University of Groningen, Centre for Development Studies.
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject China en
dc.subject land tenure en
dc.subject technical efficiency en
dc.subject SFA en
dc.subject smallholder en
dc.subject.classification Q15
dc.subject.classification D13
dc.title Land Tenure and Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Tea Producers: The Case of Ya’An City, China en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2021-2-002
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 24
local.relation.issue 2
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 21
local.citation.epage 34
local.access open
local.fulltext yes

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account