Evaluation of egovernment and good governance development in EU member countries

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ardielli, Eva
dc.contributor.author Vavrek, Roman
dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-10T08:58:05Z
dc.date.available 2019-10-10T08:58:05Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.issn 1803-9782
dc.identifier.other ACC_2019_2_01
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/153864
dc.description.abstract Dobrá správa věcí veřejných (Good Governance) je současný trend ve veřejné správě na celém světě. Zdůrazňuje efektivitu, otevřenost a transparentnost v řízení veřejných záležitostí. Důležitým faktorem dobré správy je aplikace ICT ve veřejné správě a rozšiřování eGovernmentu jako progresivního prvku modernizace veřejné správy. Příspěvek je zaměřen na zhodnocení vzájemné závislosti mezi eGovernmentem a rozvojem Good Governance v zemích Evropské unie (EU). Vzájemná závislost proměnných je zkoumána na základě hodnocení eGovernmentu pomocí metod multikriteriálního rozhodování (metoda TOPSIS) na základě hodnot indexu WGI sledovaného a zpracovávaného Světovou bankou. Na základě využití korelační a regresní analýzy byla potvrzena vzájemná závislost mezi eGovernmentem a rozvojem Good Governance v členských zemích EU. cs
dc.description.abstract Good Governance ist ein aktueller Trend in der öffentlichen Verwaltung weltweit. Dieser Trend betont Effizienz, Offenheit und Transparenz im Public-Affairs-Management. Ein wichtiger Faktor für Good Governance ist die Anwendung von ICT in der öffentlichen Verwaltung und die Ausweitung von e-Government als fortschrittlichem Element der Modernisierung der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Der Artikel befasst sich mit der Bewertung der Interdependenz zwischen e-Government und Good Governance in den Ländern der Europäischen Union (EU). Die Abhängigkeit der Variablen wird auf der Grundlage der E- Government-Bewertung unter Verwendung von Entscheidungsverfahren mit mehreren Kriterien (TOPSIS-Methode) untersucht, die auf WGI-Indexwerten basieren, die von der Weltbank überwacht und verarbeitet werden. Basierend auf der Korrelations- und Regressionsanalyse wurde die Interdependenz zwischen e-Government und der Entwicklung von Good Governance in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten bestätigt. de
dc.description.abstract Good Governance is a contemporary trend in public administration worldwide. It emphasizes efficiency, openness and transparency in the management of public affairs. An important factor of Good Governance is the application of ICT in public administration and the expansion of eGovernment, as a progressive element of the modernization of public administration. The presented article is focused on the evaluation of the interdependence between eGovernment and the development of Good Governance in the European Union (EU) countries. The interdependence of variables is examined based on the results of eGovernment evaluation model using multicriterial decision-making (MCDM) methods (TOPSIS method) and the values of WGI index monitored and processed by the World Bank. Based on the use of correlation and regression analysis, the interdependency between eGovernment and Good Governance development in EU member countries was confirmed. en
dc.description.abstract Dobre rządzenie (Good Governance) to aktualny trend w administracji publicznej na całym świecie. Trend ten podkreśla skuteczność, otwartość i przejrzystość w zarządzaniu sprawami publicznymi. Ważnym czynnikiem dobrego rządzenia jest stosowanie ICT w administracji publicznej oraz rozwój e-administracji jako postępowego elementu modernizacji administracji publicznej. Artykuł skupia się na ocenie współzależności pomiędzy administracją elektroniczną a rozwojem dobrego rządzenia w krajach Unii Europejskiej (UE). Współzależność zmiennych jest badana na podstawie oceny eGovernment przy użyciu metod wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji (metoda TOPSIS) w oparciu o wartości wskaźnika WGI badanego i opracowywanego przez Bank Światowy. Na podstawie analizy korelacji i regresji potwierdzono współzależność między administracją elektroniczną a rozwojem dobrego rządzenia w państwach członkowskich UE. pl
dc.format text
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická univerzita v Liberci, Česká republika cs
dc.relation.ispartof ACC Journal en
dc.relation.isbasedon ACCENTURE: eGovernment Leadership: Rhetoric vs Reality – Closing the Gap. [online]. 2001. [accessed 2015-07-20]. Available from WWW: http://afyonluoglu.org/PublicWebFiles/eGovBenchmark/ACC/2001-Accenture.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedon AGERE, S.: Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives. Commonwealth Secretariat, London, 2000. ISBN 978-0-85092-629-3.
dc.relation.isbasedon ALENEZI, H.; TARHINI, A.; SHARMA, S. K.: Development of quantitative model to investigate the strategic relationship between information quality and e-government benefits. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 2015. 9(3), 324–351. ISSN 1750-6166. DOI: 10.1108/TG-01-2015-0004
dc.relation.isbasedon ARDIELLI, E.; HALÁSKOVÁ, M.: Assessment of E-government in EU countries.Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2015. 22(34), 4-16. ISSN 1211555X.
dc.relation.isbasedon ARDIELLI, E.; HALÁSKOVÁ, M.: Evaluation of Good Governance in EU countries. Acta academica karviniensia. 2015. 15(3), 5-17. ISSN 1212-415X. DOI: 10.25142/aak.2015.027
dc.relation.isbasedon BHUTIA, P. W.; PHIPON, R.: Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem. Journal of Engineering. 2012. 2(10), 43-50, ISSN 2278-8719. DOI: 10.9790/3021-021034350
dc.relation.isbasedon CAPGEMINI: The User Challenge Benchmarking the Supply of Online Public Services. [online]. 2007. [accessed 2015-07-21]. Available from WWW: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9b1d1b48-9c1d-453a86a6-9e1caf7b6d98/language-en
dc.relation.isbasedon CHARRON, N.; DIJKSTRA, L.; LAPUENTE, V.: Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions. Social Indicators Research. 2015. 122(2), 315-346. ISSN 0303-8300. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
dc.relation.isbasedon CLAGUE, Ch. et al.: Contract-Intensive Money: Contract Enforcement, Property Rights, and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Growth. 1999. 4(2), 185-211. ISSN 1381-4338. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009854405184
dc.relation.isbasedon COURT, J.; HYDEN, G.: World Governance Survey: a new approach to assessing governance. [online]. 2003. [accessed 2015-02-12]. Available from WWW: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4084.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedon HAMMERSCHMID, G.: Decentralisation and Accountability as Focus of Public Administration Modernisation: A Comparative European Perspective. In: Hermann Hill (Hrsg.) Modernizing Government in Europe. pp. 255-271. 2006. ISBN print 978-3- 8329-2799-8. ISBN online 978-3-8452-0343-0. DOI: 10.5771/9783845203430-255
dc.relation.isbasedon EUROPEAN COMMISSION: EU eGovernment Report 2014 shows that usability of online public services is improving, but not fast. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016-02-16]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/euegovernment-report-2014-shows-usability-online-public-services-improving-not-fast
dc.relation.isbasedon EUROPEAN COMMISSION: The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). [online]. 2019. [accessed 2016-09-11]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/desi
dc.relation.isbasedon CAPGEMINI: Delivering on the European advantage? - ‘How European governments can and should benefit from innovative public services’, eGovernment benchmark. 2014. ISBN 978-92-79-38052-5. DOI: 10.2759/4919. ISBN 978-92-79-38051-8. DOI: 10.2759/48856.
dc.relation.isbasedon EUROSTAT: Statistical database. [online]. 2013. [accessed 2015-02-20]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
dc.relation.isbasedon EUROSTAT. Statistical database. [online]. 2016. [accessed 2015-03-22]. Available from WWW: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database?node_code=isoc_ciegi_sat
dc.relation.isbasedon GRÖNLUND, Å.: Connecting eGovernment to Real Government - The Failure of the UN eParticipation Index. In: Electronic Government. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. pp. 26-37. ISBN print 978-3-642-22877-3. ISBN online 978-3-642-22878-0. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_3
dc.relation.isbasedon HALDENWANG, Ch. Von: Electronic Government (E-Government) and Development. The European Journal of Development Research. 2004. 16(2), 417-432, ISSN 0957- 8811. DOI: 10.1080/0957881042000220886
dc.relation.isbasedon ZOLFANI, S. H.; ANTUCHEVICIENE, J.: Team Member Selecting Based on AHP and TOPSIS Grey. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics. 2012. 23(4), 425- 434. ISSN 1392-2785. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.23.4.2725
dc.relation.isbasedon KETTANI, D.; MOULIN, B.: E-government for Good Governance in developingmcountries: Empirical Evidence from the eFez Project. Anthem Press, London, 2015. ISBN 978-0-85728-125-8.
dc.relation.isbasedon KLENK, T.; NULLMEIER, F.: Public Governance als Reforms Strategie. Edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung 97. Düsseldorf, 2004. ISBN 3-935145-72-1.
dc.relation.isbasedon KRISHNAN, S.; TEO, T.; LIM, J.: Electronic Services of eGovernment in the European Union Countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2010. 15(17), 138-150. ISSN 1211-555X.
dc.relation.isbasedon LNĚNIČKA, M.: E-government Development Index and its Comparison in the EU Member States. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2015. 22(34), 75-87. ISSN 1211-555X.
dc.relation.isbasedon MÁCHOVÁ, R.: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Model for the Evaluation of the Egovernment Development. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2015. 22(34), 88-100. ISSN 1211-555X.
dc.relation.isbasedon MADZOVA, V.; SAJNOSKI, K.; DAVCEV, L.: E-Government as an Efficient Tool towards Good Governance. Balkan Social Science Review. 2013. 1, 157-174, ISSN 1857-8799.
dc.relation.isbasedon MOHAMMED, F.; IBRAHIM, O.: Refining E-government Readiness Index by Cloud Computing. Jurnal Teknologi. 2013. 65(1), 23-34. ISSN 1979-3405. DOI: 10.11113/jt.v65.1759
dc.relation.isbasedon NORRIS, P.: Digital divide: Civic engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet in Democratic Societies. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. ISBN 978-0521002233.
dc.relation.isbasedon NORTH, C. D.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. ISBN 9780521397346.
dc.relation.isbasedon OECD: OECD E-Government Project – Benefits Realisation Management. [online].2006. [accessed 2015-06-25]. Available from WWW: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=GOV/PGC/EGOV(2006)11/REV1&docLanguage=En
dc.relation.isbasedon O’CONNELL, K. A.: Computerizing Government: The Next Generation. The American City & County Journal. 2003. 118(8). ISSN 0149-337X.
dc.relation.isbasedon OLSON, D. L.: Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2004. 40(7-8), 721-727, ISSN 0895-7177. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003
dc.relation.isbasedon POTŮČEK, M. et al.: Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. Grada, a.s., Praha, 2007. ISBN 978-80-247-2126-2.
dc.relation.isbasedon RORISSA, A.; DEMISSIE, D.; PARDO, T.: Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking. Government Information Quarterly. 2011. 28(3), 354-362. ISSN 0740-624X. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006
dc.relation.isbasedon SHIH, H.-S.; SHYUR, H.-J.; LEE, E. S.: An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2007. 45(7-8), 801-813. ISSN 0895-7177. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
dc.relation.isbasedon PRADA, L. T.; PINA, V.; ROYO, S.: E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/14684520510628918 [online]. [accessed 2015-03-22]. Available from WWW: http://www.dteconz.unizar.es/DT2005-01.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedon UNITED NATIONS: United Nations E-Government Survey 2014. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016-08-02]. Available from WWW:https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey2014
dc.relation.isbasedon UNITED NATIONS. Responsive and Accountable Public Governance. ISBN 978-92-1-123196-0. [online]. 2015. [accessed 2016-09-22]. Available from WWW: http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN95253.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedon UNITED NATIONS: UN Data Center – E-Government Development Index. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016- 08-02]. Available from WWW: http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/enus/Data-Center
dc.relation.isbasedon VAVREK, R.; KOTULIČ, R.; ADAMIŠIN, P.: Topsis Method and Its Application to the Local Self-Government of the Slovak Republic. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2014. 9(3), 504-512. ISSN 18436110.
dc.relation.isbasedon VAVREK, R., KOTULIČ, R.; ADAMIŠIN, P.: Evaluation of MunicipalitiesnManagement with the Topsis Technique Emphasising on the Impact of Weights of Established Criteria. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government. 2015. 13(2), 249-264. ISSN 1581-5374. DOI: 10.4335/249-264(2015)
dc.relation.isbasedon WASEDA UNIVERSITY: IAC International E-Government Ranking Survey. [online].2015. [accessed 2018-10-02]. Available from WWW: http://www.egov.waseda.ac.jp/pdf/2015_Waseda_IAC_E-Government_Press_Release.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedon WEST, D. M.: E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review. 2004. 64(1), 15-27. ISSN 0033-3352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
dc.relation.isbasedon WORLD BANK: Worldwide Governance Indicators. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016-04-05]. Available from WWW: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home
dc.relation.isbasedon YOON, K. P.; HWANG, Ch.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage, California, 1995. ISBN 9780803954861.
dc.relation.isbasedon ZANGER, S. C.: Good Governance and European Aid: The Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics. 2000. 1(3), 293-317. ISSN 1741-2757. DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001003002
dc.subject e-government en
dc.subject European Union en
dc.subject evaluation en
dc.subject good governance en
dc.subject public administration en
dc.title Evaluation of egovernment and good governance development in EU member countries en
dc.title.alternative Zhodnocení rozvoje eGovernmentu a dobré správy v členských zemích EU cs
dc.title.alternative Bewertung der eGovernment und Good Governance Entwicklung in den Mitgliedstaaten der EU de
dc.title.alternative Ocena rozwoju egovernment i dobrego rządzenia w krajach członkowskich UE pl
dc.type Article en
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/004/2019-2-001
dc.identifier.eissn 1803-9790
local.relation.volume 25
local.relation.issue 2
local.citation.spage 7
local.citation.epage 20
local.access open
local.fulltext yes en
dc.license CC BY-NC 4.0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account