How Corporate Governance and CSR disclosure affect Firm Performance?

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manzoor, Muhammad Suhaib
dc.contributor.author Rehman, Ramiz Ur
dc.contributor.author Usman, Muhammad Islam
dc.contributor.author Ahmad, Muhammad Ishfaq
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-16T08:54:20Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-16T08:54:20Z
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/153571
dc.description.abstract The study aims to provide empirical evidence of firm performance relation with board characteristics (Independent directors, Executive directors, and CEO duality), ownership structure (Managerial, State, and Foreign ownership) and CSR disclosure. The CSR disclosure by listed firms in developing countries has become a phenomenon during recent times. However, the type of CSR disclosure is still non-financial. However, it is an interesting topic for researchers to evaluate the performance of the firm in the presence of non-financial disclosure of CSR. Firm level panel data has collected for firms listed in KSE-100 index in Pakistan between 2012 and 2016. The study uses panel data analysis to estimate the models using firm size as a control variable. Results of the empirical research indicate that firms in the service industry are less disclosing the CSR, but such disclosure is positively related to firm performance. The authors find evidence that executive directors when engaging into CSR disclosure activities, it negatively and significantly impact the firm performance. The authors qualify the results regarding the CEO duality, independent directors, managerial ownership, state ownership and foreign ownership with impact on firm performance. Further, the results suggest that state ownership is influential in the service industry and negatively affect the firm performance. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge in developing countries context that how CSR non-financial disclosure, especially in the service firms, affect the firm financial performance. Future research should use cross-country analysis for assessing the models and examining the results across countries, industry, and sectors. From a practical perspective, the results may guide firms how to engage in CSR disclosure activities without hampering the firm performance while considering the other firm level factors. This study is extensively novel in all of its contents and contributes mainly to the literature of CSR disclosure and firm performance. en
dc.format text
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon Agyemang, O. S., & Ansong, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance of Ghanaian SMEs: Mediating role of access to capital and firm reputation. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-03-2016-0007.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410.
dc.relation.isbasedon Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463. https://doi.org/10.2307/256210.
dc.relation.isbasedon Borisova, G., Brockman, P., Salas, J. M., & Zagorchev, A. (2012). Government ownership and corporate governance: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(11), 2917-2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.008.
dc.relation.isbasedon Chau, G. K., & Gray, S. J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7063(02)00153-x.
dc.relation.isbasedon Cheng, S., Lin, K. Z., & Wong, W. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 503-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9309-1.
dc.relation.isbasedon Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.001.
dc.relation.isbasedon Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. In The triple bottom line of 21st century (p. 73).
dc.relation.isbasedon Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective – a review of the empirical literature and a meta‐analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.729.
dc.relation.isbasedon Firth, M., Lin, C., & Wong, S. M. (2008). Leverage and investment under a state-owned bank lending environment: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(5), 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.002.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gunasekarage, A., Hess, K., & Hu, A. J. (2007). The influence of the degree of state ownership and the ownership concentration on the performance of listed Chinese companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 21(3), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2007.02.002.
dc.relation.isbasedon Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125
dc.relation.isbasedon Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.675.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9572-4.
dc.relation.isbasedon Javaid Lone, E., Ali, A., & Khan, I. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(5), 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-05-2016-0100.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jennifer Ho, L. C., & Taylor, M. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom‐line reporting and its determinants: evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646x.2007.01010.x.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jeon, J. Q., Lee, C., & Moffett, C. M. (2011). Effects of foreign ownership on payout policy: Evidence from the Korean market. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2), 344-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2010.08.001.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1943.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kabir, R., & Thai, H. M. (2017). Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance? Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 227-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-10-2016-0091.
dc.relation.isbasedon Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1336-0.
dc.relation.isbasedon Koo, J., & Maeng, K. (2006). Foreign ownership and investment: Evidence from Korea. Applied Economics, 38(20), 2405-2414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500427817.
dc.relation.isbasedon Krasodomska, J., & Cho, C. H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: perspectives from sell-side and buy-side financial analysts. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-02-2016-0006.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2014). Ownership, managerial entrenchment, and corporate performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12053.
dc.relation.isbasedon Le, T. V., & Buck, T. (2011). State ownership and listed firm performance: a universally negative governance relationship? Journal of Management & Governance, 15(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9098-5.
dc.relation.isbasedon Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016.
dc.relation.isbasedon Mandacı, P., & Gumus, G. (2010). Ownership concentration, managerial ownership and firm performance: Evidence from Turkey. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 5(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-010-0005-4.
dc.relation.isbasedon Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659.
dc.relation.isbasedon Mukhopadhyay, J., & Chakraborty, I. (2017). Foreign institutional investment, business groups and firm performance: Evidence from India. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.09.015.
dc.relation.isbasedon Naeem, M. A., & Welford, R. (2009). A comparative study of corporate social responsibility in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.185.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nakano, M., & Nguyen, P. (2013). Foreign ownership and firm performance: evidence from Japan's electronics industry. Applied Financial Economics, 23(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.705425.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T., & Rebolledo, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Research, 77, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.001.
dc.relation.isbasedon Phung, D. N., & Mishra, A. V. (2016). Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Vietnamese Listed Firms. Australian Economic Papers, 55(1), 63-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12056.
dc.relation.isbasedon Rashid, A. (2016). Managerial ownership and agency cost: evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 609-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2570-z.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ray, R. (2000). Child labor, child schooling, and their interaction with adult labor: Empirical evidence for Peru and Pakistan. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/14.2.347.
dc.relation.isbasedon Reguera-Alvarado, N., & Bravo, F. (2017). The effect of independent directors’ characteristics on firm performance: tenure and multiple directorships. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 590-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.045.
dc.relation.isbasedon Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9.
dc.relation.isbasedon Rose, C. (2005). Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in Listed Danish Firms: In Search of the Missing Link. European Management Journal, 23(5), 542-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.09.009.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sajjad, A., & Eweje, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in Pakistan: current trends and future directions. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: Emerging Trends in Developing Economies (pp. 163-187). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2043-9059_2014_0000008010.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838.
dc.relation.isbasedon Stainer, L. (2006). Performance management and corporate social responsibility: the strategic connection. Strategic Change, 15(5), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.761.
dc.relation.isbasedon Stevie, D., & Chris van, S. (2016). Motivations for corporate social and environmental reporting: New Zealand evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 449-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2015-0070.
dc.relation.isbasedon Syed, M. A., & Butt, S. A. (2017). Financial and non-financial determinants of corporate social responsibility: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(4), 780-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-08-2016-0146.
dc.relation.isbasedon Tang, J. (2017). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors. European Management Journal, 35(3), 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.003.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278989.
dc.relation.isbasedon Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303
dc.relation.isbasedon Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028831.
dc.relation.isbasedon Wu, M.-W., & Shen, C.-H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529-3547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.023.
dc.relation.isbasedon Zhu, J., Ye, K., Tucker, J. W., & Chan, K. J. C. (2016). Board hierarchy, independent directors, and firm value: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 262-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.09.009.
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject CSR disclosure en
dc.subject service industry en
dc.subject firm performance en
dc.subject corporate governance en
dc.subject.classification G34
dc.subject.classification M14
dc.subject.classification L25
dc.subject.classification O14
dc.title How Corporate Governance and CSR disclosure affect Firm Performance? en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-002
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 22
local.relation.issue 3
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 20
local.citation.epage 35
local.access open
local.fulltext yes
local.filename EM_3_2019_02
dc.identifier.orcid 0000-0001-6019-4781 Rehman, Ramiz Ur
dc.identifier.orcid 0000-0003-1468-1073 Ahmad, Muhammad Ishfaq


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account